The Guardian and the Conservatives…

It has long been my conviction that The Guardian is on the brink of openly endorsing the Conservatives at the next election. Yesterday, in the pages of it’s sister paper, The Observer, Richard Reeves was asking what appeared to be a largely rhetorical question about how progressive the Conservatives really are. Reeves rather fawning praise is what makes the question empty and rhetorical, in the context of his article at least, take this passage;

“The Conservative plans to let money follow the pupil to the school of their parents’ choice and, crucially, to add a pupil premium to the poorest children.”

No mention of the possible problematic involvement of the private sector. It seems to me that there is a concerted editorial drive in this direction in Guardian towers which should worry Gordon Brown and Labour very much. Today, Julian Glover is offering David Cameron some friendly advice:

“A current fashion among Tories is to call on Cameron to promote the old-timers, to give his team strength now that office looks near. He is wise to be cautious: Ken Clarke always stood apart from the worst parts of the old Tory party, which is why he makes a plausible member of the new one.”

This is clearly the justification for the line; Cameron is a man alone along with an elite band of progressive warriors who have really changed the Conservative Party for the better and ipso facto deserve a chance at governing. While it will be mortifying for Labour it should also cause us an itch of concern if The Guardian is not even willing to countenance throwing it’s weight behind us as the ‘progressive choice’ because it is a comment on how far we have to go that they feel better advised throwing their weight behind the Cameroons.


Tags: , , , ,

About darrellgoodliffe


6 responses to “The Guardian and the Conservatives…”

  1. Julian H says :

    You need more evidence.

    Columnists (whose views are independent from the papers’) always give political advice in that kind of manner.

    Meanwhile, the Observer is a separate paper, sister or otherwise.


  2. darrellgoodliffe says :


    I did blog some other pieces a while back which I am not particularly minded to link back too out of sheer laziness lol. I think there is a discernible thrust though to my eyes, tbh I dont see the same pattern emerging amoungst say Independent columnists.

    True and in deep trouble by the looks of it so you could argue it has nothing to lose.

    I guess we will just have to wait and see.


  3. Julian H says :

    Fair play, don’t think I saw the earlier pieces.


  4. darrellgoodliffe says :


    No Worries 🙂


  5. Julian H says :

    As you probably know, word is the Obs is going under.

    Then again, I’ve been waiting for the Indie to disappear for about 6 months now.


  6. darrellgoodliffe says :


    Ye I have heard that; newspapers have a knack of surviving against the odds. The Indie seems to soldier on….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: