Cruddas attempts to align Labour’s compass…

All the people who deny they would ever dream of running for the Labour leadership are moving into place for the eventuality that the ‘changed circumstance’ of a Brown resignation will leave them open to a sudden change of heart. The government continues to limp on in name only; caught in a curious state of suspended animation, like the condemned before it’s inevitable execution it is contemplating most of all itself and where it went so desperately wrong.

John Cruddas MP is therefore quite right when he says that the government is meekly accepting it’s fate and therein lies Brown’s best hope. Hopefully, from his point of view Labour MP’s won’t start to dare hope that a leader with less penalty points may, just may, be able to salvage at least something. He will also hope they don’t do the math and realise that David Cameron’s Conservatives still do have an electoral mountain to climb.  Hopefully, they won’t take any solace from the Financial Times report that marginal, swing seats, are the least hard-hit by the government’s lack of fiscal farsightedness.

Of course, this is the hope and I think it is touch and go whether it is a realistic one; of course, this summer was always going to be plagued by leadership speculation and it is only thanks to the Scottish Executive, Al-Meghari, and the increasing shambles in Afghanistan that we have been spared a daily diet of leadership speculation.

Cruddas purposes a return to Labour’s radical reforming zeal as the solution and there is no doubt that this would perhaps invigorate the core vote; coupled with the febrile atmosphere of change that would accompany a Cabinet-sponsored regicide of Brown. The notion, that James Purnell propagates in his reply, that all this would be counterposed to a ‘electoral coaltion’ is, of course, complete rubbish. Broad electoral support exists for the notion that higher income earners should pay more in taxation.

Such a realignment would slay us and make the nightmare ‘squeeze’ scenario very real and it would force some serious questions to be answered about what direction our compass points in. Questions which The Fabian Society already asks although some of its points are misdirected (support for the Child Trust Fund which is one of their favourite hobby horses) I think it is basically fair to say that against the program put forward by the likes of Cruddas, Nick Clegg’s ‘aspirations’ have little to offer the progressive voter.

It bears constant repetition; we cannot self-declare ourselves the progressive party when all we offer people are vague aspirations. Although Cruddas & Co are not likely to get anywhere close to a leadership spot this side of a massive electoral hammering that does not mean that we can take what they offer lightly.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , ,

About darrellgoodliffe

n.a

4 responses to “Cruddas attempts to align Labour’s compass…”

  1. burkesworks says :

    I just can’t understand what so many people see in Cruddas; he may constantly say the right things in the right places but hardly ever translates them into action. Apart from voting not to replace Trident, his Parliamentary voting record is shocking; not much better than unabashed Blairite zealots like Workhouse Purnell, and that man’s baleful presence would turn a dream ticket to a nightmare. There’s only one high-ish profile Labour MP left who could bring back a little “radical reforming zeal” – and that’s RADICAL, as opposed to REACTIONARY – and that MP is John McDonnell. Unfortunately the chances of him gaining the support of the party apparatchiks are on a par with those of Bradford City winning the European Champions’ League.

    Like

  2. Joe Otten says :

    I stopped reading when he referred to the Selfish Gene clearly without understanding what it was about.

    Some of his criticism of Labour is on target, but it is much an appeal to comforting nostalgia as anything else, and that will get Labour nowhere.

    Like

  3. Letters From A Tory says :

    Cruddas is right that his policies would be radical.

    They would, however, also be totally unelectable and would guarantee at least two terms in opposition for Labour.

    Like

  4. darrellgoodliffe says :

    Burkesworks,

    Maybe Cruddas has seen which way the wind is blowing in the Labour Party and is positioning himself accordingly?

    Joe,

    It might stop a massacre but I agree it wouldnt be enough to win a fourth term.

    Letters,

    Not sure I agree. Like I said there is widespread support for increased taxation on wealth and I would imagine that Cameron’s antics in power will open up a space for a strong challenge from the centre/left eventually.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: