Our cutting edge narrative?

Vince Cable has outlined proposals for £14 bn of cuts to help tackle Britain’s rather large mountain of debt. Alot of it is suitably vague; like the commitment to curbing centralisation in education which sounds very nice and laudable given that centralisation is a bad thing and according to the proposals will save £600 million. Also, the practical ramifications of ‘tapering’ the family element to tax credits sounds potentially ominous. However, as always the devil remains in the detail so it is hard to comment one way or another without knowing the full details.

Some things we do know the detail of are of course welcome, the committment not to renew Trident being one, however we wonder once again why the leadership remains economically and morally committed to our costly and wasteful intervention in Afghanistan.  I rather suspect that the main controversies will centre around the commitment to zero growth in public sector pay and the commitment to review public sector pensions which are a potential minefield. One wonders if that since the banking industry now technically constitutes the public sector if this will apply their; it should, but obviously won’t.

Also, if you look at the pre-amble to the report then there are some frankly depressing revelations;

“the emphasis for fiscal consolidation must fall on controlling public spending, not higher taxes: to commit to additional tax revenue raising from the outset undermines any commitment to setting priorities in spending,”

seemingly gone from our narrative is talk of closing loopholes and the better off paying a fair share. Instead, as is usually the case with this party we cleave to the dominant meta-narrative and try and insinuate ourselves with that which in this case gives what we say a tangy hint of Conservative blue. The above actually constitutes a u-turn when compared with statements comparatively few months ago; a few months ago, tax rises for higher brackets  were needed to pay for our proposed cuts for lower/middle income earners and now that is seemingly not wise. Needless to say this will not see us advance in any of the areas we actually think we will; ie, against Labour and won’t be enough to save Liberal Democrat MP’s in the south and Shires.

One point where I unequivocally agree with the preamble is when it makes this telling observation;

“Fiscal policy is political.”

What the above says politically is however troubling….


Tags: , , , , , ,

About darrellgoodliffe


5 responses to “Our cutting edge narrative?”

  1. Neil Stockley says :

    You say this is a “narrative” but where are the characters, the surprise, the resolution, emotional appeal etc. It looks more like a policy prescription to me.


  2. darrellgoodliffe says :


    To be slightly clearer what I meant is that the overall narrative is about ‘cuts’ and how to cut. 🙂


  3. Joe Otten says :

    And now Labour admit cuts are necessary.

    You can call it cleaving to the dominant meta-narrative if you like. I call it living in the real world. Have you looked at the numbers lately?


  4. darrellgoodliffe says :


    Nowhere have I not said they are not necessary and indeed even in this post I outline an additional area where they can be made; something you seem reluctant to discuss.

    However, this debate remains one of priorities and given a choice between a senseless intervention in Afghanistan and zero growth in public sector pay I know where my priorities would lie and I know where I think the parties as a whole should.


Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. First Class posts on Tuesday | Letters From A Tory - September 15, 2009

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: