Labour schism’s over Afghanistan….

Congratulations to Kim Howells who has used a piece in The Guardian to argue;

It would be better to bring home the great majority of our fighting men and women and concentrate, instead, on using the money saved to secure our own borders, gather intelligence on terrorist activities inside Britain.

Eric Joyce has quickly followed suit, supporting Howells. Both debunk the myth that our own security is best protected by our continued presence. Meanwhile, David Cameron used his PMQ’s questions about the corruption of Afghan police; not to mention the government which Cameron conspicuously failed to mention. Meanwhile, Nick Clegg has continued to put forward the rather bankrupt idea of a ‘government of national unity’; an idea that does nothing to  address corruption (something he has in common with Hamid Karzai) no more fundamental issues as Caron Lindsay rightly points out.  Nothing shows the failure of liberal interventionism more than the fact that it has patently failed to deliver anything like a liberal democracy. Karzai himself has pledged to fight corruption in a rather novel way; by not sacking corrupt ministers.

It is dismaying to see opposition begin to emerge with the Labour Party as serious questions are asked (not before time) about this failed intervention. Clegg has failed as an opposition leader in this regard and failed to take heed of public opinion which is being shown time after time to be for withdrawal.  He recognised the lack of legitimacy of the Afghan government but not once mentioned more fundamental issues; pretending everything would be ok if the government was more ‘ethnically inclusive’; in doing so he is blinked. In a month when the human cost of war is more in focus than others it is perhaps time that across the parties people started clamouring and pressuring their leaderships to withdraw because the price we pay in Afghanistan is no longer worth paying.


Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

About darrellgoodliffe

n.a

2 responses to “Labour schism’s over Afghanistan….”

  1. RobC says :

    No it isn’t and amidst the triviality of so much in politics this is a running sore. I would argue it is a perfect opportunity for the Lib Dems to carve out a distinctive position for themselves and challenge the failed consensus on this war. Every time I look at my son’s bright eyed university colleagues I think of their less fortunate contemporaries being blown up in this Afghan hell hole. Withdrawal is not a perfect option but remaining there and watching our young people being slaughtered for no gain is even less so. Nick Clegg stop saying me too and oppose this failed venture – now.

    Like

  2. darrellgoodliffe says :

    RobC,

    Well the reason I said it should be cross-party is, frankly, I have no faith in this leadership to take the stance both me and you want. I would agree with you but the honest truth is that they won’t; that Clegg will keep peddling the ‘last-chance’ line until the end of time because he has no courage of conviction on this issue.

    Other than that I totally agree; it is time to call for withdrawal and end this senseless waste of peoples lives.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: