Support safety and the rail strikes….

Once again, Gordon Brown has made an ill-advised intervention into an industrial dispute. He said the:

government “cannot tolerate large-scale industrial disputes” at a time when the UK was coming out of the recession.

He also added there was ‘no reason’ for the proposed national rail strike. At the heart of the dispute are proposals to cut 1,500 jobs and changes which would see more work being done in the evenings and weekends. It seems like common sense to me that this would have safety implications but the likes of Norman Baker, Liberal Democrat Transport Spokesman, have called this claim ‘scaremongering’ and criticised the strike.

Safety on the railways is, of course, a crucial issue and though strikes will disrupt passengers journey’s I think it’s safe to say that disruption is preferable to one caused by a fatal crash or incident. If neither Brown nor Baker will listen to union members (who given the fact they work on them have a right to claim they know better than politicians and managers) maybe they will take heed of the Office of Rail Regulation.

In a recent report it supported Network Rail’s changes ‘in principle’ but expressed concern about implementation:

It outlined four issues: that the changes are untested; that the west coast line could be severely affected; that section managers, who monitor sections of track, might be overworked; and that the changes could encourage staff to curtail planning and safety briefings.

In other words it has similar concerns to the ones the unions are raising and totally dismantle the Brown argument that there is ‘no reason’ for these strikes. Once again, as a Labour Prime Minister, Brown is not being impartial or neutral (something that could be forgiven and understood as a political expedient) but actively crossing the line and taking the opposite side. This is wrong and has to stop because for all the good work being done it runs the risk of undermining it and Labour’s electoral chances.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

About darrellgoodliffe


2 responses to “Support safety and the rail strikes….”

  1. DerekGoodliffe says :

    Working on the railway I see first hand how Network Rails proposed cuts will effect safety, there is less and less maintainance and rail replacement work takeing place through the week and at weekends, and this can have no other effect but to compromise the safety of the traveling public, and also the cuts would certainly compromise the safety of the track workers [ Peeway] or to give them their full title,the Permanant Way Workers. the work they undertake through the week and weekends is most important for the safe running of the railways. There should be no cutbacks leading to what will be a less safe environment for workers and the traveling public, we do not want another Hatfield,Potters Bar,to name only two horrific incidents.
    I fully support the strike and the strikers,there is no other way to get the message across, and MP,s from all Partys should stop their unhealpfull,and totaly way of the mark comments,they do not understand fully how serious the situation would be if Network Rail are allowed to get away with these proposals.


  2. darrellgoodliffe says :

    I totally agree. Safety on the railways is too important to be put at risk by cut backs of any kind and I hope rail users will support the strike as it’s in their own interests too.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: