Marching for the Alternative…and why Ed should be there…

On Saturday, 100’s of thousands will be taking to the streets of London to ‘March for the Alternative’. Rob Marchant, writing on Labour Uncut, feels that it is wrong for Ed Miliband to be there. Certainly, I am a little disappointed that Ed is the only politician being allowed to speak and would have welcomed a contribution from Caroline Lucas, for example, but still I am glad he is speaking.

Looking at Rob’s reasons, I don’t think they are as compelling as he suggests:-

  1. Labour didn’t organise it: And? If our leader is only going to ever turn up to events we can organise and carefully stage-manage then heaven help us all. He wouldn’t really get out alot and that would send the clear signal we haven’t moved on from the Blairite control-freaky that eventually hollowed the Party out.
  2. Speaking to the wrong people: In my eyes, Rob’s view of who will attend is a little jaundiced. Not only will it be trade unionists and the ‘usual suspects’ but I would suspect a fair number of community campaigners who are being badly effected by the cuts will also be there. Leaving this aside, it’s a little odd to suggest the leader of the *Labour* Party should ignore these people in any case. Opening up a dialogue with this core Labour group is exactly what the leadership should and desperately needs to be doing.
  3. The visuals: In my reply to 1 I argued how the visuals could actually be presented in a very positive way – ie, a break from our past managerial and technocratic style. So, in his argument, Rob is skewing the visuals through his already biased looking-glass and giving us only one possible version of how this could look.
  4. The message could be distorted: Here I think Rob has a valid point. He rightly accuses our economic narrative of trying to straddle two horses at once. However, given my politics I am naturally not as concerned about the falling-off as he is. The bump as we hit the ground might well provide a necessary corrective to our current course.
  5. The ‘in-the-pocket’ argument: Again, I am not as concerned about this as Rob is, only naturally given my politics. Nonetheless, I think in both points 4 and 5 he betrays a lack of self-confidence in his own and Labour’s position on the cuts, which is telling. Also, Ed did freely promise to attend this march in some form so I am not convinced a politician actually fulfilling their promise is a bad thing. Actually, by saying it will look like he was strong-armed; Rob is projecting that lack of self-confidence onto Ed.

So, credit where its due, Ed is doing the right thing here. Saturday presents a huge opportunity for the currently scattered anti-government forces to cohere into one solid fist and to remove this government. Labour should be seeking to harness that energy, not shunning it. It’s Labour’s challenge is not just to harness it in removing the government but also in the necessary radical re-building of society and the economy after the ruin brought by the crash and on the earth being scorched by this reckless and blind government. Yes, there will be challenges along the way and things wont be plain sailing but is that ever the way in politics?


Tags: , , , ,

About darrellgoodliffe


4 responses to “Marching for the Alternative…and why Ed should be there…”

  1. David Harney says :

    Yes Ed should be there. Labour have so far not officially endorsed the march, which i believe is an error. Ed being there sends a powerful message to the government, & a powerful message of support & unity to the people. Labour will naturally be the party of choice for the vast majority of people at the march come a general election & therefore this is both a welcome & positive move by the Leader & the party. Really enjoyed the blog!!!


  2. darrellgoodliffe says :


    I agree, though to be fair I think the TUC banner is broader. It does indeed. I agree. Thanks very much.


  3. Jay says :

    @David and Darrell
    Are you two kidding?
    It was because of Labour that we are in this mess. It’s easy to blame to coalition for all the cuts, yet these cut have had to come into play because of the actions of Labour.
    Red Ed, should not have been then at all. He and the rest of the party should be ashamed of themselves rather then sneering and laughing that they have once again managed to pull the wool over so many peoples eyes and dodged the blame once again, while people like you slap each other on the back saying well done.
    I am getting tired of the way this party is quick to jump on the bandwagon rather then trying to do something to restore and rebuild this country.


  4. darrellgoodliffe says :


    No we are obviously not.

    What would you have them do?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: