A stab in the back….

Nick Clegg, apparently, is open to the possibility of forming a coalition with Labour after the next election. He should be so lucky, not even our leadership is daft enough to form a coalition in which toxic Nick plays any kind of role. One of the most interesting and depressing, from a Labour-supporting point of view at least, lines of thought this whole episode opens up is what exactly are the Labour leadership thinking?

Of course, there will be an element of mischief-making involved; talking-up the possible and a dalliance with the yellow peril can only sour the increasingly strained romantic relations between the two governmental bed fellows. For Clegg, as well, he probably imagines such talk may strengthen his hand when it comes to influencing the increasingly restive Conservatives; ‘look, I have got other options’ says the notoriously flirtatious Mr Clegg. I doubt this will impress a Conservative Party that is already looking to junk its partner at the earliest possible juncture. Meanwhile, such a strategic gambit is not without its negative implications for the Labour leadership.

Although on the surface it appears to be a win-win, it is likely to alienate a significant proportion of its own activists. Certainly, those who are standing against Liberal Democrats in the upcoming election are likely to be decidedly nonplussed. However, hostility to the idea of a Coalition with the Lib Dems is however more generalised and comes from all quarters, from those recently returned to the fold, from a skeptical left that can hardly have failed to notice the contrast between the cold counsel given to the TUC and the unions compared to the warm-words for Vince Cable and, finally, from the Party-patriotic and tribalist right. LabourList‘s recent poll, finding 57% opposed to the idea of a Coalition, is likely in my mind to be indicative of how the majority of the Party feels. So, why rock the boat?

Well, for me, the answer is simple. It isn’t about short-term strategic gain (though that is obviously a plus), but more about the long-term ambition of the higher echelons of the Party to reforge the old Liberal Party, finally marginalise or even vomit-out the unions and rid the Labour Party of any last remaining flecks of red in its flag. I don’t think Ed Miliband substantively diverges from that agenda. Let’s place our cards on the table. Labour’s grand-economic plan is not to end austerity. In fact, every public proclamation of Mr Balls and Mr Miliband has told us that they intend exactly the opposite, to continue with austerity and come the election there will probably be a committment to stick to the Coalition governments spending targets. Our economic narrative is different in emphasis but not in substantive content. ‘Pre-distribution’ is obviously intended to provide ‘progressive’ gloss t0 a continuation of the slash-and-burn hack job we have seen done on Britain’s economy. From this angle, a Coalition with the Lib Dems becomes even more appealing, it would marginalise Parliamentary dissenters on Labour’s benches and give the leadership a convenient human shield to deploy when it comes to justifying itself to the membership.

All-in-all then an alliance with a ‘reborn’ and ‘rebranded’ Liberal Democrat Party looks like a win-win for the leadership. Sadly, I am convinced that if they were asked, hand-on-heart, what they would prefer I suspect many within Labour’s leading circles would prefer this outcome to Labour winning an outright majority. They will bank on the Party faithful’s desire to be back in office to railroad a deal through. However, this would be the ultimate stab-in-the-back to both the Labour membership and its supporters at the polls. Many will say this is a question that can only be answered in the future and in some senses that is right, however, the fault-lines are appearing in the here-and-now over this issue and they could well define and shape the future trajectory and course of the Party in a major way.

Advertisements

Tags: , ,

About darrellgoodliffe

n.a

2 responses to “A stab in the back….”

  1. charliecountryboy says :

    Good post, will there be a Lib Dem party worth sidling up to after the next election. Will not the Tories take most of their voters?

    Like

  2. Robert says :

    Does it matter if Labour does a deal with the devil, so long as they get back in.

    How does labour get back in we are now hearing on the local grapevine Blair is to take on the roll of getting the swing voters back into the party, so Blair will become the election general.

    This is going to be interesting will the swing voters return to labour if they think Blair is back, or will they stick with the Tories, will the Tories and Labour need the Liberals. will the Liberal’s be interested in another coalition if they are reduced to a minor party behind UKIP.

    In Wales two parties have stated they will never again go into coalitions this has been confirmed by Plaid again, and the Liberal’s have stated they were blamed for the mess made by Labour in the Assembly, that’s because both Plaid and the Liberal’s decided to change their views on things like students fee’s welfare reforms the closure of hospitals.

    So would The Liberal want to have another hammering with either Labour or the Tories, I suspect if the Welsh Liberals have any voice it will be no.

    I suspect Clegg has more to worry about then will he stay as leader, will he win his seat, I suspect he’s going to have one hell of a task in that alone, and I think he will step down move on, maybe to the Tories as special what ever.

    It’s interesting.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: